Year Published
- 2008 (0)
- 2009 (6) Apply 2009 filter
- 2010 (0)
- 2011 (0)
- 2012 (0)
- 2013 (0)
- 2014 (0)
- 2015 (2) Apply 2015 filter
- 2016 (1) Apply 2016 filter
- 2017 (1) Apply 2017 filter
- 2018 (0)
- 2019 (1) Apply 2019 filter
- 2020 (0)
- 2021 (0)
Research Topics
Populations
- Countries/Governments (9) Apply Countries/Governments filter
- Rural Populations (0)
- Smallholder Farmers (6) Apply Smallholder Farmers filter
- Women (0)
Types of Research
- (-) Remove Data Analysis filter Data Analysis
- (-) Remove Literature Review filter Literature Review
- Portfolio Review (0)
- Research Brief (3) Apply Research Brief filter
Geography
- East Africa Region and Selected Countries (2) Apply East Africa Region and Selected Countries filter
- Global (1) Apply Global filter
- South Asia Region and Selected Countries (1) Apply South Asia Region and Selected Countries filter
- Southern Africa Region and Selected Countries (3) Apply Southern Africa Region and Selected Countries filter
- Sub-Saharan Africa (0)
- West Africa Region and Selected Countries (5) Apply West Africa Region and Selected Countries filter
Dataset
- ASTI (0)
- FAOSTAT (6) Apply FAOSTAT filter
- Farmer First (0)
- LSMS & LSMS-ISA (0)
- Other Datasets (4) Apply Other Datasets filter
Current search
- (-) Remove Development Finance & Policy filter Development Finance & Policy
- (-) Remove Literature Review filter Literature Review
- (-) Remove Data Analysis filter Data Analysis
- (-) Remove Political Economy & Governance filter Political Economy & Governance
Farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) use less fertilizer than farmers in any other region in the world. Low fertilizer use is one factor explaining the lag in agricultural productivity growth in Africa. A variety of market interventions to increase fertilizer use have been attempted over the years, with limited success. In the past several decades, Malawi has tried to alter that trend through a variety of innovative programs aimed at achieving national food security through targeted input subsidy programs. The best known of these programs is Malawi’s Starter Pack Programme. The Starter Pack Programme was amended twice into the Targeted Inputs Programme (TIP) and Expanded Targeted Inputs Programme (ETIP), and eventually replaced with the Agricultural Input Subsidy Programme (AISP). The efficiency and equity of the Starter Pack Programme and its successors have been the subject of debate. This report reviews the history, implementation, and perceived effectiveness of the various input subsidy schemes in the context of Malawi’s political economy. We find that AISP is credited with significantly increasing maize yields in Malawi. However, we also find that there are serious challenges facing the most recent input subsidy program, ranging from the rising cost of the subsidy to ongoing implementation struggles related to increased bureaucracy and corruption.