Year Published
- 2008 (0)
- 2009 (1) Apply 2009 filter
- 2010 (9) Apply 2010 filter
- (-) Remove 2011 filter 2011
- (-) Remove 2012 filter 2012
- 2013 (5) Apply 2013 filter
- 2014 (4) Apply 2014 filter
- 2015 (4) Apply 2015 filter
- (-) Remove 2016 filter 2016
- 2017 (4) Apply 2017 filter
- 2018 (2) Apply 2018 filter
- 2019 (4) Apply 2019 filter
- 2020 (0)
- 2021 (2) Apply 2021 filter
Research Topics
Populations
- Countries/Governments (2) Apply Countries/Governments filter
- Rural Populations (1) Apply Rural Populations filter
- Smallholder Farmers (0)
- Women (0)
Types of Research
- Data Analysis (1) Apply Data Analysis filter
- Literature Review (11) Apply Literature Review filter
- Portfolio Review (0)
- Research Brief (0)
Geography
- East Africa Region and Selected Countries (2) Apply East Africa Region and Selected Countries filter
- Global (2) Apply Global filter
- South Asia Region and Selected Countries (6) Apply South Asia Region and Selected Countries filter
- Southern Africa Region and Selected Countries (0)
- Sub-Saharan Africa (7) Apply Sub-Saharan Africa filter
- West Africa Region and Selected Countries (2) Apply West Africa Region and Selected Countries filter
Dataset
Current search
- (-) Remove Information & Mobile Technology filter Information & Mobile Technology
- (-) Remove 2016 filter 2016
- (-) Remove 2012 filter 2012
- (-) Remove Environment & Climate Change filter Environment & Climate Change
- (-) Remove 2011 filter 2011
- (-) Remove Poverty filter Poverty
This report combines analyses from four previous EPAR briefs on the effects of climate change on maize, rice, wheat, sorghum, and millet production in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). In addition, this brief presents new analysis of the projected impact of climate changes in SSA. We include comparisons of the importance of each crop, of their vulnerability to climate change, and of the research and policy resources dedicated to each. Especially with respect to climatic susceptibility, these rankings provide a comparative summary based upon the analysis conducted in the four previous EPAR briefs, statistical analyses of historical yield and climate data, and future climate model predictions. According to the indicators analyzed, our research suggests that maize leads the cereal crops in terms of importance within SSA and in terms of research and policy attention. Our analysis of climate conditions and the crop’s physical requirements suggests that many maize-growing areas are likely to move outside the range of ideal temperature and precipitation conditions for maize production. Rice is the third most important crop in terms of consumption dependency, fourth in terms of production, but second only to maize in terms of research funding and FTEs. Sorghum and millet rank second and third in production importance and second and fifth in consumption importance, but rank below maize and rice in terms of FTE researchers. Their role is complicated by the fact that they are often considered inferior goods; SSA consumers often substitute away from sorghum and millet consumption if they are able to do so. Wheat is the least-produced crop of the five, and the second to last in terms of consumption importance. However, it still ranks above millet in terms of FTE researchers.
The purpose of this literature review is to identify the linkages between increases in agricultural productivity and poverty reduction. The relevant literature includes economic theory and evidence from applied growth and multiplier models as well as micro-level studies evaluating the impact of specific productivity increases on local poverty outcomes. We find that cross-country and micro-level empirical studies provide general support for the theories of a positive relationship between growth in agricultural productivity and poverty alleviation, regardless of the measures of productivity and poverty that are used. The evidence also suggests multiple pathways through which increases in agricultural productivity can reduce poverty, including real income changes, employment generation, rural non-farm multiplier effects, and food prices effects. However, we find that barriers to technology adoption, initial asset endowments, and constraints to market access may all inhibit the ability of the poorest to participate in the gains from agricultural productivity growth.