Year Published
- 2008 (0)
- 2009 (16) Apply 2009 filter
- 2010 (5) Apply 2010 filter
- 2011 (2) Apply 2011 filter
- 2012 (0)
- 2013 (2) Apply 2013 filter
- 2014 (0)
- 2015 (7) Apply 2015 filter
- 2016 (4) Apply 2016 filter
- 2017 (8) Apply 2017 filter
- 2018 (2) Apply 2018 filter
- 2019 (2) Apply 2019 filter
- 2020 (1) Apply 2020 filter
- 2021 (2) Apply 2021 filter
Research Topics
Populations
- (-) Remove Countries/Governments filter Countries/Governments
- Rural Populations (9) Apply Rural Populations filter
- (-) Remove Smallholder Farmers filter Smallholder Farmers
- Women (23) Apply Women filter
Types of Research
Geography
- East Africa Region and Selected Countries (15) Apply East Africa Region and Selected Countries filter
- Global (7) Apply Global filter
- South Asia Region and Selected Countries (8) Apply South Asia Region and Selected Countries filter
- Southern Africa Region and Selected Countries (4) Apply Southern Africa Region and Selected Countries filter
- Sub-Saharan Africa (19) Apply Sub-Saharan Africa filter
- West Africa Region and Selected Countries (9) Apply West Africa Region and Selected Countries filter
Dataset
Current search
- (-) Remove Smallholder Farmers filter Smallholder Farmers
- (-) Remove Countries/Governments filter Countries/Governments
Special Economic Zones (SEZs) are generally defined as geographically delimited areas administered by a single body, offering certain incentives (duty-free importing and streamlined customs procedures, for instance) to businesses that physically locate within the zone. This literature review provides a baseline analysis of SEZs and their potential impacts on smallholder farmers in SSA. Criticism on SEZs is distinctly divided between those who criticize on social or environmental grounds versus those who question the economic impact of SEZs. SEZs are often criticized based on perceived negative socio-economic impacts—particularly their negative impact on women, labor, and working conditions. This review includes several country-specific studies that find evidence that SEZs actually have higher environmental standards and higher worker satisfaction than outside the SEZ. Most responses to criticisms do note, however, that the case studies’ results are not necessarily generalizable to SEZs throughout the world. The literature review includes key elements of successes and failures pulled from the case studies of SEZs in SSA. Though the evidence is insufficient to conclusively determine if smallholder farmers receive direct benefits from SEZs and their associated agroindustrial contracts, this review finds that resources provided to farmers (credit at rates lower than bank rates, technical or managerial assistance, pesticides, seeds, and fertilizer on credit) tend to be concentrated among larger farmers. The report concludes with a note on donor involvement as well as recommendations for further research.